On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Jannis Froese <
s9jafroe@stud.uni-saarland.de> wrote:

>  I think most concerns about the current use of asserts would be resolved
> if the currently used asserts would be changed to a nicer definition which
> is independent of NDEBUG, and a second class of debugging asserts would be
> introduced, which is exclusively for expensive, redundant checks and is
> disabled by NDEBUG.
>

Sounds good to me.

Wladimir