I agree with BIP 0021<br><br>Wladimir<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Amir Taaki <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:zgenjix@yahoo.com">zgenjix@yahoo.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div style="font-size:12pt;font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif"><div>Matt Corallo posted a modification of BIP 20 in an earlier email and I asked him if he wanted to become the champion of that BIP he submitted.</div>
<div><br></div><div>It is a modification of BIP 20 sans the alternative non-decimal number stuff.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0021" target="_blank">https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0021</a><br>
</div><div><br></div><div>Right now, I will ask the GUI client implementations like MultiBit or Bitcoin-Qt, not different codebases like BitCoinJ or libbitcoin if they support BIP 20 or BIP 21. Feel free to raise any objections.</div>
<div><br></div><div>More weight will be given to GUIs with actual URI scheme implementations and it&#39;s good to have a general consensus.</div></div></div><br>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>

Try before you buy = See our experts in action!<br>
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers<br>
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,<br>
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!<br>
<a href="http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2" target="_blank">http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development" target="_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>