On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Any opinions about a numbering scheme? Currently the value 60000 is
> used. We could
> > simply start increasing the number one by one now for every change, or
> we could
> > do a "cleanup" to 100000 first, and start incrementing from there.
>
>
> It would be nice to have 100000 as the baseline, "frozen" protocol.
>

Yes, I think increasing with one is enough for now. Let's not get ahead of
ourselves :)

Wladimir