On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any opinions about a numbering scheme? Currently the value 60000 is used. We could
> simply start increasing the number one by one now for every change, or we could
> do a "cleanup" to 100000 first, and start incrementing from there.


It would be nice to have 100000 as the baseline, "frozen" protocol.

Yes, I think increasing with one is enough for now. Let's not get ahead of ourselves :)

Wladimir