On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote:

> There's a reason why luke-jr's pull request for CPfP remains open.
>


> There is general agreement that it appears to be useful.  CPfP works
> to close the mismatch between how bitcoin transaction fees are
> attached by the sender, versus modern economic situations where the
> receiver is willing to pay a fee.
>

The only thing controversial are the code changes themselves, not the
feature.

Consensus running through the comments in the pull is that it needs
(auto)tests.

Are you going to do this Luke? Or is anyone else working on this?

Wladimir