From: Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph•org>
To: Daniel Hoffman <danielhoffman699@gmail•com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Number Request: Addresses over Audio
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 02:14:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgR-weACn_Ezg8-uZuSH0QT5dfLEFE5WO2VDi0nx8H1e9g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL9WuQXsbBJ0UwdS+o=UqJCcsebcPa9Ug5A=uNtc6Z+9CNEFPg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1210 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Daniel Hoffman via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I have updated the GitHub a lot (changed tones to be less chirpy, fixed
> some smalls) and made a couple of samples (see attachment for MP3 and FLAC
> of both tone tables, first 16 then 4). Is this good enough to warrant an
> official BIP number? I haven't built a decoder yet, but it seems like the
> encoder is working properly (looked at Audacity, seems like it is working),
> and some people on reddit want to "allow for decoding experiments"
> <https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4wsn7v/bip_proposal_addresses_over_audio_thoughts/d69m3st>
>
> What suggestions do you all have for it?
>
With DSP hat on, your decoder for noisy/distorted channels will be 99.9% of
the complexity and will completely control the design of the encoder.
It's not a proposal yet without a decoder, it's just an idea. FSK modems
microphone-channel (terrible multipath) is quite challenging and several
other parties have tried to do bitcoin info over audio in the past without
success.
It's very interesting, but I think you do need to go through and get the
whole thing working to really gauge viability.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1732 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-10 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-08 21:22 Daniel Hoffman
2016-08-08 22:06 ` Justin Newton
2016-08-08 22:35 ` Daniel Hoffman
2016-08-08 22:59 ` Trevin Hofmann
2016-08-09 1:50 ` Daniel Hoffman
2016-08-09 23:06 ` Daniel Hoffman
2016-08-10 0:17 ` Jannes Faber
2016-08-10 0:27 ` Chris Riley
2016-08-10 0:36 ` Luke Dashjr
2016-08-10 1:09 ` Thomas Daede
2016-08-10 1:53 ` Daniel Hoffman
2016-08-10 2:14 ` Gregory Maxwell [this message]
2016-08-10 10:41 ` Tier Nolan
2016-08-10 11:42 ` Erik Aronesty
2016-08-10 11:49 ` Theo Chino
2016-08-10 16:01 ` Daniel Hoffman
2016-08-10 17:28 ` Erik Aronesty
2016-08-10 17:38 ` Pieter Wuille
2016-08-10 17:55 ` Daniel Hoffman
2016-08-10 22:31 ` James MacWhyte
2016-08-11 13:55 ` Erik Aronesty
2016-08-11 15:13 ` Tier Nolan
2016-08-11 20:37 ` Erik Aronesty
2016-08-12 0:36 ` Gregory Maxwell
2016-08-12 12:36 ` Erik Aronesty
2016-08-12 15:49 ` Jorge Timón
2016-08-12 18:39 ` James MacWhyte
2016-08-13 4:41 ` Daniel Hoffman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAS2fgR-weACn_Ezg8-uZuSH0QT5dfLEFE5WO2VDi0nx8H1e9g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=greg@xiph$(echo .)org \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=danielhoffman699@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox