From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail•com>
To: Rick Wesson <rick@support-intelligence•com>
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New standard transaction types: time to schedule a blockchain split?
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:19:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgTARAMqMu79Sp4XS4KxmUBWiXebpavHWr-EdLZbxS=sTw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ1JLtsxPG9v-Hwdb-pfgY6GU0Z4it+frFzw_tObVbNC6Xgdjw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Rick Wesson
<rick@support-intelligence•com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail•com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr•org> wrote:
>>
>> > - Replace hard limits (like 1 MB maximum block size) with something that
>> > can
>> > dynamically adapt with the times. Maybe based on difficulty so it can't
>> > be
>> > gamed?
>> Too early for that.
> Could you provide a reference to why in your estimation it is "to early."
> Simpy stating this as fact isn't enough to sway demand.
Can you provide a reference to this 'demand' a post by Luke isn't
enough to support the claim of demand.
We're not at maximum size right now (thankfully).
We don't know what the network dynamics would look like at that
traffic level. So how could we competently say what the right metrics
would be to get the right behavior there? Thats what I meant by too
early.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-24 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-24 15:12 Gavin Andresen
2011-08-24 15:17 ` Rick Wesson
2011-08-24 15:45 ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-08-24 15:55 ` Rick Wesson
2011-08-24 16:05 ` Douglas Huff
2011-08-24 16:15 ` Luke-Jr
2011-08-24 16:46 ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-08-24 17:03 ` Luke-Jr
2011-08-24 17:07 ` Rick Wesson
2011-08-24 17:19 ` Gregory Maxwell [this message]
2011-08-24 17:40 ` Rick Wesson
2011-08-24 17:57 ` Gavin Andresen
2011-08-24 18:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-25 7:39 ` Michael Grønager
2011-08-25 17:18 ` Gavin Andresen
2011-08-26 10:50 ` Mike Hearn
2011-08-27 1:36 ` bgroff
2011-08-25 18:31 ` Gregory Maxwell
[not found] ` <20110825201026.GA21380@ulyssis.org>
2011-08-25 20:29 ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-08-25 21:06 ` Pieter Wuille
2011-08-24 17:03 ` theymos
2011-08-24 17:47 ` bgroff
2011-08-24 19:05 ` Christian Decker
2011-08-24 20:29 ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-08-24 22:27 ` Douglas Huff
2011-08-25 21:30 ` Christian Decker
2011-08-26 11:42 ` Mike Hearn
2011-08-26 19:44 ` Gavin Andresen
2011-08-27 1:15 ` bgroff
2011-08-24 16:18 Pieter Wuille
2011-08-24 16:26 ` Luke-Jr
2011-08-25 20:14 Pieter Wuille
2011-08-26 11:09 ` Mike Hearn
2011-08-26 21:30 ` Pieter Wuille
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAS2fgTARAMqMu79Sp4XS4KxmUBWiXebpavHWr-EdLZbxS=sTw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=gmaxwell@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
--cc=rick@support-intelligence$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox