public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail•com>
To: Mike Koss <mike@coinlab•com>
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Ultimate Blockchain Compression w/ trust-free lite node
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:02:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgTBH4bo5UebOcjHgJL+mf_020SobR=WME_haufnmv-j2g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErK2CgH1k2oosn2a7HyvDxvasw1pHh6jPVWG0JUORMVHettOQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Mike Koss <mike@coinlab•com> wrote:
> Are we just talking about pruning the spent transactions from an old block?

No.

We're talking about commitments to the state of _unspent_ transactions
which would allow ~memoryless nodes to engage in full validation
without having to trust anything with the help of some untrusted
non-memoryless peers.  Also, talking about being able to securely
initialize new pruned nodes (not memoryless but reduced memory)
without exposing them to the old history of the chain. In both cases
this is possible without substantially degrading the full node
security model (rule violations prior to where they begin are only
undetectable with a conspiracy of the entire network).

But it requires a new data structure for managing these trees of
unspent transactions in a secure, scalable, and DOS resistant manner.
Fortunately there are lots of possibilities here.

> Does it really make sense to adopt a more complex data-structure than the merkle tree for inclusing in the bticoin protocol?

Yes. Though this is obviously not an ultra short term thing.



  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-19 16:46 Andrew Miller
2012-06-19 17:33 ` Alan Reiner
2012-06-19 17:59   ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-06-19 18:12     ` Alan Reiner
2012-06-19 18:18   ` Mark Friedenbach
2012-06-19 18:30     ` Alan Reiner
2012-06-21 21:42       ` Mike Koss
2012-06-21 22:02         ` Gregory Maxwell [this message]
2012-06-19 18:29 Andrew Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAS2fgTBH4bo5UebOcjHgJL+mf_020SobR=WME_haufnmv-j2g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=gmaxwell@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    --cc=mike@coinlab$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox