I don't think that rights are a pillar of how bitcoin works - rather I would say it's a matter of aligned incentives. The fact is that the majority technically *can* dictate through PoW and acceptance. The only reason that the majority would not chose this path is because there is greater economic value in consensus, whether perceived or realized.

If bitcoin were about "doing the right thing" there wouldn't be a need for PoW since no individual would be incentivized to double spend.

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Jorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote:

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Ivan Brightly <ibrightly@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Jorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote:
>>
>>
>> No, this is very important. The majority has no right to dictate on
>> the minority.
>
>
> While an interesting philosophical question, I don't think that this is
> accurate. First off, bitcoin doesn't imbue any 'rights' on individuals - it
> provides the choice of participating or not, nothing more.

I think you're not contradicting me: ff there's not rights built into
the system, the majority has no "right to dictate" anything.