From: Ivan Brightly <ibrightly@gmail•com>
To: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>,
Washington Sanchez <washington.sanchez@gmail•com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamic limit to the block size - BIP draft discussion
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:28:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAre=yRawFU_WMdE+ReemscYD33ez1PF6VhU2FmWo2fAEcw_Xw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADJgMztJx1cBFhNOwMgBHJGPmBNPqsTdQbCCjFBmDBSBfTMMUg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1522 bytes --]
This is true, but miners already control block size through soft caps.
Miners are fully capable of producing smaller blocks regardless of the max
block limit, with or without collusion. Arguably, there is no need to ever
reduce the max block size unless technology advances for some reason
reverse course - aka, WW3 takes a toll on the internet and the average
bandwidth available halves. The likelihood of significant technology
contraction in the near future seems rather unlikely and is more broadly
problematic for society than bitcoin specifically.
The only reason for reducing the max block limit other than technology
availability is if you think that this is what will produce the fee market,
which is back to an economic discussion - not a technology scaling
discussion.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:49 AM, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > but allow meaningful relief to transaction volume pressure in response
> to true market demand
>
> If blocksize can only increase then it's like a market that only goes
> up which is unrealistic. Transaction will volume ebb and flow
> significantly. Some people have been looking at transaction volume
> charts over time and all they can see is an exponential curve which
> they think will go on forever, yet nothing goes up forever and it will
> go through significant trend cycles (like everything does). If you
> dont want to hurt the fee market, the blocksize has to be elastic and
> allow contraction as well as expansion.
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1956 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-08 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-08 7:45 Washington Sanchez
2015-09-08 8:49 ` Btc Drak
2015-09-08 12:28 ` Ivan Brightly [this message]
2015-09-08 13:13 ` Adam Back
2015-09-08 13:52 ` Ivan Brightly
2015-09-08 14:02 ` Washington Sanchez
2015-09-08 14:18 ` Adam Back
2015-09-08 15:10 ` Washington Sanchez
2015-09-08 16:46 ` Andrew Johnson
2015-09-08 17:04 ` Gavin Andresen
2015-09-08 23:11 ` Washington Sanchez
2015-09-09 13:10 ` Washington Sanchez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAre=yRawFU_WMdE+ReemscYD33ez1PF6VhU2FmWo2fAEcw_Xw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ibrightly@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=btcdrak@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=washington.sanchez@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox