On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 08:07:54PM -0400, Greg Sanders wrote:
> I don't doubt the use case(it's why I opened the issue!). I didn't want the
> proposal to die in case people found it odd that 61, 62, 63, but not 64
> bytes ended up being broadcast able.
>
> Perhaps this is not an issue, especially since this isn't a consensus
> change like the Great Consensus Cleanup. Willing to change my proposal and
> PR if people have no strong objections.

I think it's fine if we only restrict 64 bytes. We have a specific reason to do
that and it's ok if we just tell people that. Only fairly-technical use-cases
are affected anyway.

--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org