Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Ephemeral Anchors: Fixing V3 Package RBF againstpackage limit pinning

From: Greg Sanders <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 09:59:09 -0500

Hi Peter,

For the most principled of reasons:

Because I have to change test vectors everywhere!

Greg

On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 9:52 AM Peter Todd <[email-masked]> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 09:05:20AM -0500, Greg Sanders via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > Hello again dev,
> >
> > Due to the interest in the proposal and the prodding of certain folks,
> I've
> > written up a short draft BIP of the Ephemeral Anchors idea here:
> >
> https://github.com/instagibbs/bips/blob/ephemeral_anchor/bip-ephemeralanchors.mediawiki
> >
> > The pull request at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26403 has
> been
> > refreshed on top of the latest V3 proposal, but the BIP itself is
> > unaffected.
>
> The BIP states that:
>
>     Why OP_2 not OP_TRUE? OP_TRUE is often used in test vectors, using
> OP_2 has
>     the same benefits and none of these common collisions.
>
> Why is a "collision" harmful in this case?
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>