>That requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing the whole community.

I'll take that as a "no". But it's a strange bar to set: perfect representation of entire community. By that token, nobody can say anything is controversial if a different group is disagreeing.

Greg

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:25 AM, NxtChg <nxtchg@hush.com> wrote:

On 6/27/2015 at 3:18 PM, "Greg Sanders" <gsanders87@gmail.com> wrote:

>Can we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial hard fork?

That requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing the whole community.

And no shady lobbying behind the scenes too.