This is beyond ridiculous...Color kernel which works with padding is still quite simple. I think we have extra 10-50 lines of code to handle padding in coloredcoinlib. Essentially we have a couple of lines like this :
value_wop = tx.outputs[oi].value - padding(value_wop means "value without padding").And then we have like 10 lines of code which selects padding for a transaction.That's not a lot of extra complexity. And it solves the problem once and for all.What you propose instead: "a different colored coin representing 10 shares, and another one representing 100 shares (like the different denominations of dollar bills)" is much more complex, and it won't work:Suppose you have $100 coin, as a single coin.How do you send $54.23?That's simply impossible.So you'd rather push complexity to higher levels (and create inconvenience for end users, as you admitted yourself) than add 10-50 lines of code to color kernel?I just do not understand this.But I'm not going to argue. I already wrote everything which I could write on this topic.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put Bad Developers to Shame
Dominate Development with Jenkins Continuous Integration
Continuously Automate Build, Test & Deployment
Start a new project now. Try Jenkins in the cloud.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13600_Cloudbees
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development