On Sep 16, 2015 4:49 PM, "Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev" <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Jorge Timón <jtimon@jtimon.cc> wrote:
>>
>> No, 95% is safer and will produce less orphaned blocks.
>
> The point of the 75% is just as a test run.  Enforcement wouldn't happen
until 95%.
>
> At 75%, if someone sets the bit, then they should be creating valid
blocks (under the rule).

You shouldn't rely on that, some may start applying the restrictions in
their own blocks at 0% and others only at 90%. Until it becomes a consensus
rule it is just part of the standard policy (and we shouldn't rely on nodes
following the standard policy).
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>