From: "Jorge Timón" <jtimon@jtimon•cc>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr•org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:16:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABm2gDqdVOejHCMvd16wE3iR+aUnWKdk8cG_sWDrmRcFhfbuQA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202104252100.07296.luke@dashjr.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1257 bytes --]
> Despite the continual harassment, I have even made two efforts to try to
> (fairly) make things faster, and have been obstructed both times by ST
> advocates. It appears they intend to paint me as "deliberately refusing"
> (to
> use your words) in order to try to put Bitcoin and the BIP process under
> their control, and abuse it in the same manner in which they abused
> Bitcoin
> Core's usual standards (by releasing ST without community consensus).
>
I haven'tpaying attention to the BIPs.
But I just want to say I agree it is the case that speed trial didn't have
consensus and had many good and logical arguments against it.
Sadly discussions around taproot activation I've been lacking logic and
having too many irrational arguments appealing to emotions.
I'm really disapointed at the community right now.
I'm sorry for luke and others defending lot=true (the whole point of bip8
anyway), but I feel ignored and frustrated when I try to participate in
these irrational debates.
I miss the rational debates here.
But if we're gping to turn this list into an irrational place, with ad
hominem fallacies and insults, I guess I can say my subjective personal
opinion about other people too.
I think it is you, Matt, who is playing dumb, not Luke.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2017 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-27 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-23 2:09 [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm Luke Dashjr
2021-04-23 3:36 ` Jeremy
2021-04-23 7:49 ` John Newbery
2021-04-23 7:50 ` Pindar Wong
2021-04-23 9:11 ` Eric Martindale
2021-04-23 15:34 ` Antoine Riard
2021-04-24 10:16 ` nopara73
2021-04-25 20:29 ` [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs Matt Corallo
2021-04-25 21:00 ` Luke Dashjr
2021-04-25 21:14 ` Matt Corallo
2021-04-25 21:22 ` Luke Dashjr
2021-04-25 21:31 ` Matt Corallo
2021-04-26 19:43 ` David A. Harding
2021-04-26 20:04 ` Greg Maxwell
2021-04-27 19:43 ` Melvin Carvalho
2021-04-27 9:04 ` W. J. van der Laan
2021-04-27 11:49 ` Erik Aronesty
2021-04-27 11:33 ` John Newbery
2021-04-27 12:16 ` Jorge Timón [this message]
2021-04-26 15:02 ` [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP editor: Kalle Alm Sjors Provoost
2021-04-26 16:56 ` James O'Beirne
2021-04-26 18:13 ` W. J. van der Laan
2021-09-15 9:50 [bitcoin-dev] Reminder on the Purpose of BIPs Prayank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABm2gDqdVOejHCMvd16wE3iR+aUnWKdk8cG_sWDrmRcFhfbuQA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jtimon@jtimon$(echo .)cc \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=luke@dashjr$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox