Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Draft BIP : fixed-schedule block size increase

From: Jorge Timón <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:58:18 +0200

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Ross Nicoll <[email-masked]> wrote:
> I don't think essentially replacing most of Testnet with a specialised test
> chain is a good idea, but this might be a good time to consider a 4th test
> network with very large blocks from genesis onwards.

You may be interested in this patch/PR:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6382

Why only one more testchain when you can add
std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max() new testchains with approximately
the same code?