Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Alternative name for CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (BIP112)

From: Jorge Timón <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:35:58 +0100

On Nov 24, 2015 1:21 PM, "Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev" <
[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> Whatever we call it, deciding on that is a simple s/FOO/BAR/ prior to
> release.

While I agree we're not in a hurry, the more we wait, the longer docs (to
be modified later) will accumulate making the assumption that the name is
csv rather than op_maturity.