Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Motivation and deployment of consensus rules changes ([soft/hard]forks)

From: Jorge Timón <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 12:31:34 +0200

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Tier Nolan <[email-masked]> wrote:
> The off by 1 bug could be fixed by a soft fork.  Since the point is to show
> how a non-controversial hard fork works, it doesn't matter much.

You mean the timewarp fix can be coded as a softfork instead of a
hardfork? How so?
If that's the case, do you have a better candidate?