public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Newton <justin@netki•com>
To: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach•de>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP75 - Out of Band Address Exchange
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:43:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABqynxK+bdh=6_RbE0c4KXwrTz=f47Ddn=C-iTSEMwZKBPUQdA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nbublk$d1f$1@ger.gmane.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2684 bytes --]

I think we would be open to either leaving them in, or doing a separate
BIP.  What do others think?  I’d prefer to keep them together if the
changes are non-controversial just to cut down on #of BIP’s, but thats not
a strong preference.

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> I think it's a bad idea to pollute the original idea of this BIP with
> other extensions. Other extensions should go to separate BIPs,
> especially since methods to clarify the fee have nothing to do with
> secure and authenticated bi-directional BIP70 communication.
>
>
> On 03/10/2016 10:43 PM, James MacWhyte via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Our BIP (officially proposed on March 1) has tentatively been assigned
> > number 75. Also, the title has been changed to "Out of Band Address
> > Exchange using Payment Protocol Encryption" to be more accurate.
> >
> > We thought it would be good to take this opportunity to add some
> > optional fields to the BIP70 paymentDetails message. The new fields are:
> > subtractable fee (give permission to the sender to use some of the
> > requested amount towards the transaction fee), fee per kb (the minimum
> > fee required to be accepted as zeroconf), and replace by fee (whether or
> > not a transaction with the RBF flag will be accepted with zeroconf). I
> > know it doesn't make much sense for merchants to accept RBF with
> > zeroconf, so that last one might be used more to explicitly refuse RBF
> > transactions (and allow the automation of choosing a setting based on
> > who you are transacting with).
> >
> > I see BIP75 as a general modernization of BIP70, so I think it should be
> > fine to include these extensions in the new BIP, even though these
> > fields are not specific to the features we are proposing. Please take a
> > look at the relevant section and let me know if anyone has any concerns:
> >
> https://github.com/techguy613/bips/blob/master/bip-0075.mediawiki#Extending_BIP70_PaymentDetails
> >
> > The BIP70 extensions page in our fork has also been updated.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bitcoin-dev mailing list
> > bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>



-- 

Justin W. Newton
Founder/CEO
Netki, Inc.

justin@netki•com
+1.818.261.4248

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4998 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: PastedGraphic-1.tiff --]
[-- Type: image/tiff, Size: 10972 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-11 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-10 21:43 James MacWhyte
2016-03-11 11:54 ` Andreas Schildbach
2016-03-11 19:32   ` James MacWhyte
2016-03-12 14:40     ` Andreas Schildbach
2016-03-11 22:43   ` Justin Newton [this message]
2016-03-12 15:00     ` Andreas Schildbach
2016-03-17  1:23       ` James MacWhyte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABqynxK+bdh=6_RbE0c4KXwrTz=f47Ddn=C-iTSEMwZKBPUQdA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=justin@netki$(echo .)com \
    --cc=andreas@schildbach$(echo .)de \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox