On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
To maximize fork divergence, it might make sense to require this. Any
sensible proposal for a hard fork would include a change to the sighash
anyway, so might as well make it required, no?

Compatibility with existing transaction-signing software and hardware should be considered.

I think any hard fork proposal should support a reasonable number of reasonable-size old-sighash transactions, to allow a smooth transaction of wallet software and hardware and to support anybody who might have a hardware wallet locked away in a safe deposit box for years.

--
--
Gavin Andresen