If fullRBF would become default and this would become dominant, zero-conf acceptance would become extremely difficult and would impact significantly this market share because its not the everyday users who would actually worry about it however the attackers would be all over it.

As it is today the network has brief periods of stress when trxs are delayed but in general clears regularly and from time to time there is stress. Today actors' wallets and merchants etc already have the option of RBF.
________________________________

Daniel Lipshitz
Phone: +44 113 4900 117
Skype: daniellipshitz123
Twitter: @daniellipshitz


On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 12:04 AM Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com> wrote:
There has never been any enforcement of miner preferences.   The convention is changing quickly, since miners are squeezed for cash and want to capture every nickel, plus there are bounties for full rbf being posted every day.

I would suggest considering to continue doing business, as usual, as if full rbf is present.

This means:

- managing risk
- waiting for confirmations if the risk is too high
- using lightning if possible

No other coin or chain offers a safer way to do business than lightning over bitcoin.




On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 7:32 AM Daniel Lipshitz via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
HI All

I am the CEO of GAP600. We guarantee zero confirmed Bitcoin and other crypto  transactions, BTC is a primary part of our business. Our guarantee enables our customers to recognise zero-conf deposits. We reimburse our clients value of the trx should we get it wrong and a transaction we confirmed gets double spent.

Should full RBF become default enabled and significantly adopted this would have a major impact on the capacity to accept zerof confs on mainnet. With the end result being this use case will be forced to move to a different chain, with lightning being just another option.

I wanted to share some statistics about how significant this use case is. 
GAP600 clients are primarily payment processors and non custodial liquidity providers; you can see some of our clients on our site www.gap600.com. There are also merchants who have developed their own tools so GAP600 statistics are only a subset of the full use case. 

I do not know of any wallet, exchange or custodian who accepts zero conf without having some sort of solution in place. The market seems to be fully aware of the risks of zero-conf. The opt-RBF seems to be a solution which gives a clear free choice for actors.

Statistics for consideration as a sample of the zero conf use case - 

  1. As of end of Nov 2022 - GAP600 has processed i.e responded to circa 15M transactions
  2. These transactions have a cumulative value of 2.3B USD value. 
  3. We currently are seeing circa 1.5M transactions queired per month. 

It's a sizable amount of trxs on mainet and we are by no means the full market of platforms accepting zero-conf.  I realise there are other considerations which BTC has,  I would urge you to take into account the major risk being placed on this significant market share when deciding to make this feature default enabled and encouraging full adoption.

Thank you for your consideration
Daniel
________________________________

Daniel Lipshitz

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev