This would not effect optinrbf only fullRBF On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 16:00 Lucas Ontivero wrote: > Some wallets like Electrum would be affected by that because they use RBF > to batch transactions so, outputs cannot be exactly the same as before. > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 10:09 AM Daniel Lipshitz via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> I dont think there was anything technical with the implementation and as >> far as I can tell this is well developed and ready. >> >> The reasons I can find for not being adopted are listed here - >> https://bitcoincore.org/en/faq/optin_rbf/ under - Why not >> First-seen-safe Replace-by-fee >> >> Those reasons do not seem pertinent here - given OptinRBF already exists >> as an option and the added benefit of continuing to be able to support >> 0-conf. >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Daniel Lipshitz >> GAP600| www.gap600.com >> Phone: +44 113 4900 117 >> Skype: daniellipshitz123 >> Twitter: @daniellipshitz >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:59 AM John Carvalho wrote: >> >>> Why wasn't this solution put in place back then? Are there problems with >>> the design? >>> >>> While I still think there are unhealthy side-effects of Full-RBF (like >>> more doublespending at unknowing merchants, after years of FSS protection) >>> I think discussion of this FSS-RBF feature is worth considering. >>> >>> -- >>> John Carvalho >>> CEO, Synonym.to >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 8:09 AM Daniel Lipshitz >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you for bringing that to my attention, apologies for not being >>>> aware of it. >>>> >>>> First-seen-safe replace-by-fee as detailed here >>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008248.html >>>> by Peter Todd seems to be a very suitable option and route >>>> which balances FullRBF while retaining the significant 0-conf use case. >>>> >>>> This would seem like a good way forward. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 6:20 AM Yuval Kogman >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008248.html >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> bitcoin-dev mailing list >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >> > -- ________________________________ Daniel Lipshitz GAP600 www.Gap600.com