From: Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail•com>
To: Daniel Weigl <Daniel.Weigl@mycelium•com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] RFC for BIP: Derivation scheme for P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH based accounts
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:07:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACq0ZD4EWNxmsbz4pUv30ZPS9O+paMNzqvaHpL6uZ5tF-up4iQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5760259B.7040409@mycelium.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1116 bytes --]
This works for segwit version 1 with the addition of also using a different
chain id.
I presume that segwit version 2 will be implementing schnorr signatures.
What do we know about the likely implementation details? Is there any way
to avoid using a third derivation path to support it?
Aaron Voisine
co-founder and CEO
breadwallet <http://breadwallet.com>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Daniel Weigl via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Following up to the discussion last month (
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2016-May/012695.html
> ), ive prepared a proposal for a BIP here:
>
>
> https://github.com/DanielWeigl/bips/blob/master/bip-p2sh-accounts.mediawiki
>
>
> Any comments on it? Does anyone working on a BIP44 compliant wallet
> implement something different?
> If there are no objection, id also like to request a number for it.
>
> Thx,
> Daniel
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2159 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-18 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 15:41 Daniel Weigl
2016-06-15 10:26 ` Jochen Hoenicke
2016-06-15 10:53 ` Daniel Weigl
2016-06-15 11:00 ` Pieter Wuille
2016-06-15 17:08 ` Russell O'Connor
2016-06-18 6:07 ` Aaron Voisine [this message]
2016-09-07 9:42 ` [bitcoin-dev] [cont'd] " Daniel Weigl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACq0ZD4EWNxmsbz4pUv30ZPS9O+paMNzqvaHpL6uZ5tF-up4iQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=voisine@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=Daniel.Weigl@mycelium$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox