We should use relay and default tx selection rules to raise the cost of double spend attacks as far as it is easy and practical to do so. This increases the value of the bitcoin network by making it practical to use in more situations for more people. Merchants of course can't rely on them being cryptographically safe, but the safer they are, the more useful.

The argument that since they can't be made perfectly safe, they should be as easy as possible to reverse so that merchants learn not to rely on them, is an incorrect one that reduces the usefulness and value of bitcoin. Merchants will learn very quickly what the costs of accepting bitcoin payments are, and the lower they are, the greater bitcoin merchant adoption will be.


Aaron Voisine
co-founder and CEO
breadwallet.com

On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com> wrote:
One more thing I would like to add to this thread: I want to make it unequivocally clear that I believe what is making double-spends easier has relatively little to do with the protocol and almost everything to do with poor software and poor security policy on the merchant end. Perhaps it isn’t prudent to push out changes to the relay policy that make these exploits even easier right now - but we NEED to be applying some kind of pressure on the merchant end to upgrade their stuff to be more resilient so that we have more room for changes on things like relay policy without significant disruption to the network.

- Eric Lombrozo

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development