Please announce such meetings with more than ~24 hours notice -- this has happened several times and while I recognize the pace of development on this issue I think that slotting a consensus meeting with less than 24 hours is inappropriate.
I think we should proactively postpone it a week so that there isn't an arbitrary "too low turnout" measure and instead anyone who really wants to be present for the meeting can plan to be.
So as not to lose momentum on having a discussion, I propose to plan to hold a general discussion tomorrow at that time and a meeting (with the intent of resolving issues in a more binding way) next week. It may be a good idea to hold the time slot every other week for the next while so that we can avoid this 24 hour thing altogether.
It sucks to lose another week but a precedent of 24 hour notice meetings for non urgent changes is very negative.
(This isn't any comment on if ST is OK or not -- the schedules proposed for ST thus far seem acceptable to me)
Best,
Jeremy