From: Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail•com>
To: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin-Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] side-chains & 2-way pegging (Re: is there a way to do bitcoin-staging?)
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:52:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADK=3HymjDVZKBHB0Q39C=izYNCH6hN+a7a7Mi3jeMF7E=O6qQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABaSBawmfP0m98jM_5qyHEoJmVK_UeBsc=Odf5QMb0Nw-pAp3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Sorry Bryan, this was the first paper posted to this list since I've
been on it that I added to my site. I was quite excited about this.
I was not planning on and certainly won't be making this advertisement
after every paper posted on this list (I may do it on reddit). I did
post on reddit a few times yes, but I assumed that this list's user
base didn't overlap extremely (does it?). I'm not sure why my posts
got down voted there. The down voters gave me no constructive feedback
about the usefulness of my site, and neither have you.
Are you able to give me your feedback on the site I've spent quite
some time setting up privately so that we don't spam this list again?
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail•com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Murrell <dsmurrell@gmail•com> wrote:
>> p.s. I'm not trying to monetize this site. I just tried to make
>> something I thought could be useful.
>
> [Unsolicited administrivia follows.]
>
> You have been posting this in a bunch of places for a while now, at
> least three times today by my count on other mediums. I also observed
> negative karma scores associated with these posts. Maybe you could
> consider toning down the message frequency? I think by now everyone
> knows you want them to use your site. I also think that in the limit
> that it would be inappropriate for /everyone/ to post all possible
> research sites, or even vaguely topical discussion sites, for every
> paper posted. Personally, I would much rather have discussions happen
> on the mailing list anyway, although if I had a different opinion I
> certainly hope I would still send this message.
>
> Thank you.
>
> - Bryan
> http://heybryan.org/
> 1 512 203 0507
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-22 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-22 21:54 Adam Back
2014-10-22 22:01 ` Daniel Murrell
2014-10-22 22:35 ` Bryan Bishop
2014-10-22 22:52 ` Daniel Murrell [this message]
2014-10-23 0:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2014-10-31 18:58 ` Melvin Carvalho
2014-11-03 12:12 ` Alex Mizrahi
2014-11-03 14:14 ` Jorge Timón
2014-11-03 16:01 ` Alex Mizrahi
2014-11-03 17:32 ` Jorge Timón
2014-11-03 17:54 ` Andrew Poelstra
2014-11-03 19:38 ` odinn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADK=3HymjDVZKBHB0Q39C=izYNCH6hN+a7a7Mi3jeMF7E=O6qQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dsmurrell@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
--cc=kanzure@gmail$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox