It sounds like folks think testnet is useful enough to continue maintaining. I think it's a fair point that testnet should strive to be as similar to mainnet as possible. If we fix the difficulty reset edge case then that will arguably make testnet EVEN MORE like mainnet by removing the "block storm" phenomenon. Changing the supply schedule is an interesting proposal, though I'd counter that fixing the difficulty reset will naturally make the supply schedule more evenly distributed over time, plus we can hopefully move toward resetting the network before long. I'd be slightly worried about changing consensus rules on testnet that deviate significantly from mainnet because I bet there are plenty of systems running that validate that rule or make assumptions that it's the same as mainnet, and deploying such a change could cause far more grief for the developer ecosystem. On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 5:29 PM Peter Todd wrote: > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 06:01:51PM -0300, Nagaev Boris wrote: > > > If we fix the difficulty reset bug, we might as well also fix the coin > supply > > > issue: get rid of the halving for testnet and just make every block > create new > > > coins. > > > > If such a change is made, then such a network won't be suitable to > > test halvings and software behaviour related to halvings. > > I don't think that's very important. That's a very small part of what > testnet > is used for, and nothing stops people from using, say, regtest for that > kind of > testing. We already changed important consensus code around difficulty with > testnet-specific behavior. > > -- > https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CADL_X_cmcXxHke089OD_45VRJy5aR%2B9uj-18bSjXBE7FKwR-Jw%40mail.gmail.com.