On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 12:21 PM, joe2015--- via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Remember this is proposed as an alternative to hardforks, which is also a "nuclear option".  Hardforks carry significant risks such as permanently splitting Bitcoin into two chains if global consensus is never reached.  A (generalized) softfork avoids this problem.

Current hard fork implementations include / will include miner lock-in, just like any soft fork.  They will not activate if global consensus is not reached.