Add: 

For - If everyone agrees an increase is required at some point, The longer you leave it the greater the numbers who have to upgrade

Against - Insufficient testing before moving to production ready releases sets a bad precedent

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Timón <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on
"each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.
[...]
Here's the updated both-thread lists:

http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb

I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on the block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed. 


Feedback welcome. 
 

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev