Also, quick question, is groups.io has same structure as Linux Foundation? foundation/transparency/openness... I think in general it would be great if this migration will be communicated much more in advance with relaxed timelines, just by examining priori cases, it's all suggestions. hope next phase will be more inclusive and open.

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:45 AM Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:35:47PM -0400, Warren Togami Jr. via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> The new archive will be operated independently outside from the Linux
> Foundation as generated by this open source tool. This hopefully will allow
> all future archives to never move again even if the underlying list
> infrastructure needs to change. Folks will appreciate the search function
> and git clone for a local instance.

Where will that git archive actually be created/maintained? As this will be a
Git repo, looks like getting it timestamped could be as simple as installing
OpenTimestamps appropriately on whatever server is actually maintaining it.

Equally, it'd be good to have the archive PGP signed.

--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev