you mixed up BitMail with BitMessage, this is different: http://bitmail.sf.net 2013/8/13 The Doctor > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/09/2013 03:01 PM, Randolph D. wrote: > > anyone tested the secure encrypted p2p email: > > http://bitmail.sf.net > > Not lately. It's pretty CPU and network intensive, which may or may > not be detrimental to your use case. > > I keep meaning to read through these security analyses of Bitmessage > but I'm a little short on compute cycles at the moment: > > https://bitmessage.org/forum/index.php?topic=1666.0 > > > http://www.reddit.com/r/bitmessage/comments/1fwyx7/a_security_analysis_of_bitmessage/ > > - -- > The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS] > Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/ > > PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1 > WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/ > > If at first you don't succeed, call for an airstrike. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAlIKk94ACgkQO9j/K4B7F8FMsgCgkuM56fI4hVT9H1ueZSFwl9Kk > qRoAoJkKZf4afKgVQKtDO6zRd/Auc/RV > =zwmX > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! > It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. > Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. > Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >