* [Bitcoin-development] Regtest Address Version Change Proposal @ 2014-05-13 9:45 Warren Togami Jr. 2014-05-13 10:30 ` Mike Hearn 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Warren Togami Jr. @ 2014-05-13 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bitcoin Dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 570 bytes --] Hi folks, I propose changing all of the address versions in -regtest mode to be unique so they are no longer identical to testnet. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/List_of_address_prefixes For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or R. We need to know if any existing tools would need to be modified to support this change to regtest. Do existing tools outside of pull tester expect regtest to have testnet addresses? If the quantity of tools that currently handle regtest is small then we can modify them to the new address versions. Warren Togami [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 789 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bitcoin-development] Regtest Address Version Change Proposal 2014-05-13 9:45 [Bitcoin-development] Regtest Address Version Change Proposal Warren Togami Jr. @ 2014-05-13 10:30 ` Mike Hearn 2014-05-13 11:02 ` Warren Togami Jr. 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Hearn @ 2014-05-13 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Warren Togami Jr.; +Cc: Bitcoin Dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1447 bytes --] Yes, bitcoinj supports and uses regtest mode. It would also have to be changed. You didn't provide a rationale for this. What's the cost of having them be the same? On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail•com>wrote: > Hi folks, > > I propose changing all of the address versions in -regtest mode to be > unique so they are no longer identical to testnet. > > https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/List_of_address_prefixes > For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or R. > > We need to know if any existing tools would need to be modified to support > this change to regtest. Do existing tools outside of pull tester expect > regtest to have testnet addresses? If the quantity of tools that currently > handle regtest is small then we can modify them to the new address versions. > > Warren Togami > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE > Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. > Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform > available > Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." > http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2303 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bitcoin-development] Regtest Address Version Change Proposal 2014-05-13 10:30 ` Mike Hearn @ 2014-05-13 11:02 ` Warren Togami Jr. 2014-05-13 11:28 ` Mike Hearn 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Warren Togami Jr. @ 2014-05-13 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mike Hearn; +Cc: Bitcoin Dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1900 bytes --] bitcore guesses the network from the address version in several places in its code. They don't want to change that. Perhaps it wasn't the wisest approach for them to use. I thought it might be simple to change the address version since its still relatively new and it isn't a real network. Would it be too much work to change? On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99•net> wrote: > Yes, bitcoinj supports and uses regtest mode. It would also have to be > changed. > > You didn't provide a rationale for this. What's the cost of having them be > the same? > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail•com>wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> I propose changing all of the address versions in -regtest mode to be >> unique so they are no longer identical to testnet. >> >> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/List_of_address_prefixes >> For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or R. >> >> We need to know if any existing tools would need to be modified to >> support this change to regtest. Do existing tools outside of pull tester >> expect regtest to have testnet addresses? If the quantity of tools that >> currently handle regtest is small then we can modify them to the new >> address versions. >> >> Warren Togami >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE >> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. >> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform >> available >> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs >> _______________________________________________ >> Bitcoin-development mailing list >> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >> >> > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3095 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bitcoin-development] Regtest Address Version Change Proposal 2014-05-13 11:02 ` Warren Togami Jr. @ 2014-05-13 11:28 ` Mike Hearn 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Mike Hearn @ 2014-05-13 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Warren Togami Jr.; +Cc: Bitcoin Dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2523 bytes --] And they can't just do NetworkParams.TESTNET = NetworkParams.REGTEST at the start of a program that is connecting to regtest? It's not like changing the address code is a huge problem or anything, but it would disrupt a bunch of people and seems kind of annoying. Surely there's a simpler way to work around this issue on their side? I mean their code already has to know what network is *expected*, right, otherwise what stops you accidentally trying to send coins cross chain? On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail•com>wrote: > bitcore guesses the network from the address version in several places in > its code. They don't want to change that. Perhaps it wasn't the wisest > approach for them to use. I thought it might be simple to change the > address version since its still relatively new and it isn't a real network. > Would it be too much work to change? > > > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Mike Hearn <mike@plan99•net> wrote: > >> Yes, bitcoinj supports and uses regtest mode. It would also have to be >> changed. >> >> You didn't provide a rationale for this. What's the cost of having them >> be the same? >> >> >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Warren Togami Jr. <wtogami@gmail•com>wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I propose changing all of the address versions in -regtest mode to be >>> unique so they are no longer identical to testnet. >>> >>> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/List_of_address_prefixes >>> For example, regtest pubkey hash addresses could begin with r or R. >>> >>> We need to know if any existing tools would need to be modified to >>> support this change to regtest. Do existing tools outside of pull tester >>> expect regtest to have testnet addresses? If the quantity of tools that >>> currently handle regtest is small then we can modify them to the new >>> address versions. >>> >>> Warren Togami >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE >>> Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. >>> Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform >>> available >>> Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bitcoin-development mailing list >>> Bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >>> >>> >> > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4102 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-13 11:28 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-05-13 9:45 [Bitcoin-development] Regtest Address Version Change Proposal Warren Togami Jr. 2014-05-13 10:30 ` Mike Hearn 2014-05-13 11:02 ` Warren Togami Jr. 2014-05-13 11:28 ` Mike Hearn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox