I might agree this would be helpful for the many phones plugged into power and on wifi for large portions of the day.  However that doesn't really help much when phone IP addresses change often as you move onto different networks, and currently IP address is the only thing that peers can keep track of for the goodness of a peer as there is no roaming pseudo-identity cookie due to separate goal of anonymity?  I haven't studied the issue if would be even possible to have both privacy protection and unique node identifiers for anti-DoS authentication at the same time.

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
The user interface for this stuff is very simple: "How much bandwidth
will you contribute back? If you contribute more bandwidth back, other
peers will prioritize you and your wallet will be more reliable."

--
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
000000000000003cfc051263917373a1cab2655994b97c54a625021f52c84658