public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Miller <amiller@cs•ucf.edu>
To: bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Ultimate Blockchain Compression w/ trust-free lite node
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:29:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAF7tpEzi80MT5Ud46_BgvnLKXrcWhkNZNOiuY7NMnL-z0C0GqA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Alan Reiner wrote:
> A PATRICIA tree/trie would be ideal, in my mind, as it also has a
> completely deterministic structure, and is an order-of-magnitude more
> space-efficient.  Insert, delete and query times are still O(1).
> However, it is not a trivial implementation.  I have occasionally looked
> for implementations, but not found any that were satisfactory.

PATRICIA Tries (aka Radix trees) have worst-case O(k), where k is the
number of bits in the key. Notice that since we would storing k-bit
hashes, the number of elements must be less than 2^k, or else by
birthday paradox we would have a hash collision! So O(log N) <= O(k).

You're right, though, that such a trie would have the property that
any two trees containing the same data (leaves) will be identical. I
can't think of any reason why this is useful, although I am hoping we
can figure out what is triggering your intuition to desire this! I am
indeed assuming that the tree will be incrementally constructed
according to the canonical (blockchain) ordering of transactions, and
that the balancing rules are agreed on as part of the protocol.

-- 
Andrew Miller



             reply	other threads:[~2012-06-19 18:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-19 18:29 Andrew Miller [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-19 16:46 Andrew Miller
2012-06-19 17:33 ` Alan Reiner
2012-06-19 17:59   ` Gregory Maxwell
2012-06-19 18:12     ` Alan Reiner
2012-06-19 18:18   ` Mark Friedenbach
2012-06-19 18:30     ` Alan Reiner
2012-06-21 21:42       ` Mike Koss
2012-06-21 22:02         ` Gregory Maxwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAF7tpEzi80MT5Ud46_BgvnLKXrcWhkNZNOiuY7NMnL-z0C0GqA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=amiller@cs$(echo .)ucf.edu \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox