Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] segwit naming ambiguity

From: Pavol Rusnak <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 12:06:22 +0200

Here's my idea for a clean API:

1. `is_segwit()` returns true for a p2tr output

2. a function `segwit_version()` which returns an int according to segwit
version used

3. helper functions like `is_p2wpkh()`, `is_p2tr()`, `is_p2wsh()` for all
script types which all return a bool

On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 at 08:41, Tobin Harding via bitcoin-dev <
[email-masked]> wrote:

> Question for OG bitcoin API designers please.
>
> If you were to see the following function
>
>     `is_segwit()`
>
> would you assume it returns `true` or `false` for a p2tr transaction?
>
>
> Currently we (rust-bitcoin) are being liberal with the use of `v0` but
> its a pretty ugly. Is there an official, or widely used, name for segwit
> v0?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tobin.
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol "Stick" Rusnak
Co-Founder, SatoshiLabs