Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't temporary

From: Sriram Karra <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:00:08 +0530

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <
[email-masked]> wrote:

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev
>
>
> > Miners who don't validate have a habit of bleeding money:   that's the
> > system working as designed.
>
> The information I have currently is that the parties engaging in that
> activity found it to be tremendously profitable, even including losses
> from issues.

Is there any shred of evidence either of you can share to support your
claims on this pivotal point of interest to everyone here?