There are good, valid arguments in support of promoting both the reference client, Bitcoin-QT, and for offering a lighter-weight alternative. Why not outline these arguments on bitcoin.org and provide links to each; or even links to a variety of alternative wallet solutions alongside descriptions of their respective benefits and drawbacks? Is there an advantage to having a singular "recommended" client?

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Bill Hees <billhees@gmail.com> wrote:

There are good, valid arguments in support of promoting both the reference client, Bitcoin-QT, and for offering a lighter-weight alternative. Why not outline these arguments on bitcoin.org and provide links to each; or even links to a variety of alternative wallet solutions alongside descriptions of their respective benefits and drawbacks? Is there an advantage to having a singular "recommended" client?

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> wrote:

I vote "yes" to have MultiBit replace Bitcoin-Qt as the recommended
desktop wallet app. I think most users will be happier with it.

If I'm wrong, it is easy to change back.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development