On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:

Strongly disagree with buying "votes", or portraying open standards as a
voting process. Also, this depends on address reuse, so it's fundamentally
flawed in design.

The point of this is it's available right now. It's not ideal, but it will work. It doesn't require any code and we can do it today.

In case you haven't been paying attention; there's already enough support for Unlimited to prevent SegWit from ever being adopted. Without significant community outreach (which is the purpose of the CCVS) and a compelling solution to max block size, Core as a product is dead.

Also, you need to be pretty paranoid to believe that address reuse is an issue in this situation.

Note also that the BIP process already has BIP Comments for leaving textual
opinions on the BIP unrelated to stake. See BIP 2 for details on that.

This does nothing for the community in general. Plus there's no way to measure that sort of feedback.

- t.k.