> more than sufficient support for LOT=True to proceed safely This seems to contradict what you said about "there was never any consensus reached on the LOT parameter". Can you clarify? On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:13 AM BitcoinMechanic via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Taproot activation meeting on IRC - Tuesday 13th April 19:00 UTC > > The focus of the meeting will be ratifying the Taproot activation plan > previously discussed at the March 16th meeting (aka 2021-03 Plan Y as > summarized here): > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1K3pmH09yXLTHGV3wqFZGR3ei7QVwtdEwo0PjI2NHD3w/edit#gid=0 > > While there was never any consensus reached on the LOT parameter, there > appears to be consensus on BIP8 and the remaining parameters, and more than > sufficient support for LOT=True to proceed safely. > > Miners will have 18 months in which to signal and accelerate activation. > If not, taproot will activate regardless. > > With a majority of the economy running this it will guarantee eventual > lock-in of taproot with the smallest chance of a chain split. > > As a reminder, the channel is also open for ongoing discussion 24/7, and > there is a web chat client here: > > https://webchat.freenode.net/?channel=##taproot-activation > > Best, > > Bitcoin Mechanic > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >