* [bitcoin-dev] AsicBoost
@ 2016-04-01 4:41 Timo Hanke
2016-04-01 9:00 ` Peter Todd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Timo Hanke @ 2016-04-01 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bitcoin-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 308 bytes --]
Hi.
I'd like to announce a white paper that describes a very new and
significant algorithmic improvement to the Bitcoin mining process which has
never been discussed in public before. The white paper can be found here:
http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Timo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdf
Regards,
Timo
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 521 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AsicBoost
2016-04-01 4:41 [bitcoin-dev] AsicBoost Timo Hanke
@ 2016-04-01 9:00 ` Peter Todd
2016-04-04 23:01 ` Mustafa Al-Bassam
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Todd @ 2016-04-01 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Timo Hanke; +Cc: bitcoin-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 815 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:41:40PM -0700, Timo Hanke via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'd like to announce a white paper that describes a very new and
> significant algorithmic improvement to the Bitcoin mining process which has
> never been discussed in public before. The white paper can be found here:
>
> http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Timo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdf
What steps are you going to take to make sure that this improvement is
available to all ASIC designers/mfgs on a equal opportunity basis?
The fact that you've chosen to patent this improvement could be a
centralization concern depending on the licensing model used. For example, one
could imagine a licensing model that gave one manufacture exclusive rights.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AsicBoost
2016-04-01 9:00 ` Peter Todd
@ 2016-04-04 23:01 ` Mustafa Al-Bassam
2016-04-06 11:57 ` Marek Palatinus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mustafa Al-Bassam @ 2016-04-04 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Todd, Timo Hanke; +Cc: bitcoin-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1303 bytes --]
Alternatively scenario: it will cause a sudden increase of Bitcoin mines
in countries where the algorithm is not patented, possibly causing a
geographical decentralization of miners from countries that already have
a lot of miners like China (if it is patented in China).
On 01/04/16 10:00, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:41:40PM -0700, Timo Hanke via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'd like to announce a white paper that describes a very new and
>> significant algorithmic improvement to the Bitcoin mining process which has
>> never been discussed in public before. The white paper can be found here:
>>
>> http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Timo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdf
> What steps are you going to take to make sure that this improvement is
> available to all ASIC designers/mfgs on a equal opportunity basis?
>
> The fact that you've chosen to patent this improvement could be a
> centralization concern depending on the licensing model used. For example, one
> could imagine a licensing model that gave one manufacture exclusive rights.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2153 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AsicBoost
2016-04-04 23:01 ` Mustafa Al-Bassam
@ 2016-04-06 11:57 ` Marek Palatinus
2016-04-06 12:09 ` Mustafa Al-Bassam
2016-04-08 20:58 ` Timo Hanke
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marek Palatinus @ 2016-04-06 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mustafa Al-Bassam; +Cc: bitcoin-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1746 bytes --]
To my understanding it is purely software thing. It cannot be detected from
outside if miner uses this improvement or not. So patenting it is worthless.
slush
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Mustafa Al-Bassam via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Alternatively scenario: it will cause a sudden increase of Bitcoin mines
> in countries where the algorithm is not patented, possibly causing a
> geographical decentralization of miners from countries that already have a
> lot of miners like China (if it is patented in China).
>
> On 01/04/16 10:00, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:41:40PM -0700, Timo Hanke via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I'd like to announce a white paper that describes a very new and
> significant algorithmic improvement to the Bitcoin mining process which has
> never been discussed in public before. The white paper can be found here:
> http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Timo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdf
>
> What steps are you going to take to make sure that this improvement is
> available to all ASIC designers/mfgs on a equal opportunity basis?
>
> The fact that you've chosen to patent this improvement could be a
> centralization concern depending on the licensing model used. For example, one
> could imagine a licensing model that gave one manufacture exclusive rights.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing listbitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.orghttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2935 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AsicBoost
2016-04-06 11:57 ` Marek Palatinus
@ 2016-04-06 12:09 ` Mustafa Al-Bassam
2016-04-08 20:58 ` Timo Hanke
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mustafa Al-Bassam @ 2016-04-06 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marek Palatinus; +Cc: bitcoin-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3027 bytes --]
It will prevent companies from legally selling mining rigs with the
improvement, which stems access to the improvement in patented
countries. Or miners can export rigs with the improvement from companies
that sell it in non-patented countries.
It is not purely a software thing - it is intended to be used by
modifying hardware. From the paper: "The performance gain is achieved
through a high-level optimization of the Bitcoin mining algorithm which
allows for drastic reduction in gate count on the mining chip. AsicBoost
is applicable to all types of mining hardware and chip designs."
Ultimately though, I think you're right in that Bitcoin's mining and
decentralized design combined with an international economy makes
patenting mining algorithms effectively pointless.
Mustafa
On 06/04/16 12:57, Marek Palatinus wrote:
> To my understanding it is purely software thing. It cannot be detected
> from outside if miner uses this improvement or not. So patenting it is
> worthless.
>
> slush
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Mustafa Al-Bassam via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>
> Alternatively scenario: it will cause a sudden increase of Bitcoin
> mines in countries where the algorithm is not patented, possibly
> causing a geographical decentralization of miners from countries
> that already have a lot of miners like China (if it is patented in
> China).
>
> On 01/04/16 10:00, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:41:40PM -0700, Timo Hanke via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I'd like to announce a white paper that describes a very new and
>>> significant algorithmic improvement to the Bitcoin mining process which has
>>> never been discussed in public before. The white paper can be found here:
>>>
>>> http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Timo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdf
>>> <http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/%7ETimo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdf>
>> What steps are you going to take to make sure that this improvement is
>> available to all ASIC designers/mfgs on a equal opportunity basis?
>>
>> The fact that you've chosen to patent this improvement could be a
>> centralization concern depending on the licensing model used. For example, one
>> could imagine a licensing model that gave one manufacture exclusive rights.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
>> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org>
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4976 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [bitcoin-dev] AsicBoost
2016-04-06 11:57 ` Marek Palatinus
2016-04-06 12:09 ` Mustafa Al-Bassam
@ 2016-04-08 20:58 ` Timo Hanke
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Timo Hanke @ 2016-04-08 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marek Palatinus; +Cc: bitcoin-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2124 bytes --]
Slush,
You can actually detect the use of this improvement by looking at the I/O
of the chip, the I/O of an on-board micro-controller or even at the system
I/O because all the communication including the mining pool protocol is
different.
Timo
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Marek Palatinus <marek@palatinus•cz> wrote:
> To my understanding it is purely software thing. It cannot be detected
> from outside if miner uses this improvement or not. So patenting it is
> worthless.
>
> slush
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Mustafa Al-Bassam via bitcoin-dev <
> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Alternatively scenario: it will cause a sudden increase of Bitcoin mines
>> in countries where the algorithm is not patented, possibly causing a
>> geographical decentralization of miners from countries that already have a
>> lot of miners like China (if it is patented in China).
>>
>> On 01/04/16 10:00, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:41:40PM -0700, Timo Hanke via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I'd like to announce a white paper that describes a very new and
>> significant algorithmic improvement to the Bitcoin mining process which has
>> never been discussed in public before. The white paper can be found here:
>> http://www.math.rwth-aachen.de/~Timo.Hanke/AsicBoostWhitepaperrev5.pdf
>>
>> What steps are you going to take to make sure that this improvement is
>> available to all ASIC designers/mfgs on a equal opportunity basis?
>>
>> The fact that you've chosen to patent this improvement could be a
>> centralization concern depending on the licensing model used. For example, one
>> could imagine a licensing model that gave one manufacture exclusive rights.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing listbitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.orghttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>>
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3652 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-08 20:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-01 4:41 [bitcoin-dev] AsicBoost Timo Hanke
2016-04-01 9:00 ` Peter Todd
2016-04-04 23:01 ` Mustafa Al-Bassam
2016-04-06 11:57 ` Marek Palatinus
2016-04-06 12:09 ` Mustafa Al-Bassam
2016-04-08 20:58 ` Timo Hanke
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox