Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Finite monetary supply for Bitcoin

From: Daryl Banttari <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 16:51:09 -0500

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Gregory Maxwell <[email-masked]> wrote:

> But owing to a rather large bribe (or at least not less large than any
> other offered by competing parties) I hereby assign BIP 42 for this
> proposal.
>

What about BIP 420?  Everyone knows if you add zero it's still the same
number.