I like the intend of this attempt to bring more clarity to the blocksize debate, however it would be more help to make this a information site about the current outstanding BIPs and summarize their differences rather than voting mechanism. (ofcourse the author of the BIPs would "vote" for their own proposals.) It would be good to include supporting and counter statements regards to these BIPs on the site. in addition to highlight certain things like pools in china have voiced their opinion that increase should happen, and 8mb is something they are comfortable with, which is not directly related to a single BIP, but never the less relevant in this discussion. On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 21 August 2015 02:31:51 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev > > wrote: > >> What might be valuable is to ask devs to explain what their threat > >models are, what should be at the root of their thinking about the > >blocksize. > > > >That's exactly what the "Technical Opinion" column is for. > > What if could be used for; theres value in being more explicit. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vDG > AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MIAIMtLLA4q7KJiwrYrpjFWme1ys9iyPZiADJGQWG3qKlH > Q4pEcwWt69jfTUCjLYfegsDW4eEMarejs568iSF70hvGB4OPWrYK3YiM1cWlWtDD > seN3G/4dJjehL7h1Nz+/OTjTlePkguHctRlJTavel8sI7fg356iMJc1Ggm5Q1ZFl > CLrivr/CEO7Qk9Uo5ewhnwConKjLygSyv67SSaMJW7pZB06uTX6M3lk11c/RB/C6 > JKPqxkvOmNIX9U8S/G3Y2pYf3/up72IhP0Ugp31iOsz629B2WvEsDYu/0SP61+oZ > za9HrP2g8OsxVq6SUD3MukmbRVKklvcnro4vk5sOlYI= > =Jfl+ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > -- *Yifu Guo* *"Life is an everlasting self-improvement."*