personally, if the software works better (less bugs) then btc will be more valuable. offering bounty is orthorginal to finding the right technical lead that will hurd the effort. put a bounty (salary) on the person to lead the effort, not the bugs -rick On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:20:07 AM John Smith wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Joel Joonatan Kaartinen > > wrote: > > > Perhaps even add a way for anyone add to the bounty attached to a bug > on > > > the bug tracker? Also, a listing page for bugs with their bounties > might > > > be nice too. > > > > Good idea. I'm not sure if the github bug tracker supports extension > > attributes, but it'd be a great place to add it. Also, people can let > know > > that they're already working on a feature using a comment, to prevent > > double work. > > I'm not sure a few small bounties would justify agreeing to GitHub's steep > demand for potentially unlimited money in their terms of service... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. > Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. > Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >