On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Mike Hearn wrote: > > That's why I conclude the opposite - if there is no fork, then people's > confidence in Bitcoin will be seriously damaged. > Yes, that is a possibility. > If it's impossible to do something as trivial as removing a temporary hack > Satoshi put in place, then what about bigger challenges? > This is absolutely not a trivial change. It is a trivial *code* change. It is not a trivial change to the economics of a $3.2B system. -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/