Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] User vote in blocksize through fees

From: Jeff Garzik <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 01:13:00 -0400

On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Eric Lombrozo <[email-masked]> wrote:

> 2) BIP100 has direct economic consequences…and particularly for miners. It
> lends itself to much greater corruptibility.
>
>
What is the alternative?  Have a Chief Scientist or Technical Advisory
Board choose what is a proper fee, what is a proper level of
decentralization, a proper growth factor?

-- 
Jeff Garzik
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
BitPay, Inc.      https://bitpay.com/