"static address" seems like a reasonable attempt at describing intended use/direction. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Ben Davenport > wrote: > > But may I suggest we consider changing the name "stealth address" to > > something more neutral? > > ACK. Regardless of the 'political' overtones, I think stealth is a > little cringe-worthy. > > "Private address" would be fine if not for confusion with private-keys. > > "Static address" is perhaps the best in my view. (also helps improve > awareness that normal addresses are intended to be more one-use-ness) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/