public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Smith <witchspace81@gmail•com>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail•com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists•sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Change to multiple executables?
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 17:45:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJNQ0stfYFN2YCGq-be5D-XW+81ZkVVM_jHHonSy2OHsNyN1Cw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T0Yvssr04AeT3B8+Gj43hV=P0Uw6M0f+NBNygnAyruQ4A@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1880 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail•com>wrote:

> RE: splitting off the "send commands to a running bitcoin" :
>
> I'm mildly against it. It would be less confusing for newbies, at the
> cost of forcing everybody who has already written backup scripts or
> other interact-with-running-bitcoin tools to tweak their code. The
> coding will be easy, but do you really want to spend the time to
> answer all the "I installed Bitcoin X.Y and now my backup script
> doesn't work" questions and modify the wiki pages and ...
>

As the project is still in "experimental" phase I suppose people can expect
changes like this? And the change is pretty much trivial, and it makes sense
for a future direction (UI<->Wallet in separate processes for security
concerns).

To be honest I feel a bit like every change that I (and I've also heard this
from others) propose is shot down, no matter how well formulated.  This is
actively discouraging developers from joining this project.

Of course it makes sense to be a careful, but the project is not on life
support is it? Satoshi did a great job making the program, but his work was
not perfect, and it makes sense to look ahead a bit.

I think it would be better to switch to two branches, like most other open
source projects I've worked with:

0.3.x -> small, compatible changes, bugfixes, like now
0.4.x -> trunk, more impactful changes, refactorings, eventual major release

Both will obviously be fully compatible on the P2P-level.


> I'd rather that time be spent working on any remaining build issues so
> we can switch to bitcoin-qt.  I don't care if it is autotools or qmake
> or QT creator, I just care that it works on Windows and Linux under
> gitian and has clear instructions so I can build it on my Mac.
>

I could do the Gitian stuff but not the Mac instructions, as I don't have a
Mac...

JS

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2445 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-10 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-10  9:36 John Smith
2011-08-10 10:14 ` Matt Corallo
2011-08-10 10:26   ` John Smith
2011-08-10 10:43   ` Pieter Wuille
     [not found]     ` <CAJNQ0ssWeU2vgR8XmCyGiZ3UHPv=zjLZEKVM=gqP0ozSC7Wmiw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-08-10 13:18       ` John Smith
2011-08-10 16:49         ` Gavin Andresen
2011-08-10 17:45           ` John Smith [this message]
2011-08-10 18:41             ` Gavin Andresen
2011-08-10 19:32               ` Andy Parkins
2011-08-10 19:57                 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-10 21:13                   ` Andy Parkins
2011-08-10 21:35                     ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-10 22:38                       ` Andy Parkins
2011-08-11  3:20                         ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-11  5:47                           ` Andy Parkins
2011-08-11 11:45                             ` Joel Joonatan Kaartinen
2011-08-11 12:01                               ` Christian Decker
2011-08-11 14:04                               ` Andy Parkins
2011-08-11 12:11                     ` Mike Hearn
2011-08-11 13:51                       ` Andy Parkins
2011-08-11 12:19               ` John Smith
2011-08-11 13:08                 ` Pieter Wuille
2011-08-10 18:43             ` Luke-Jr
2011-08-10 19:48               ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-10 21:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-08-11 13:50 ` Pieter Wuille

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJNQ0stfYFN2YCGq-be5D-XW+81ZkVVM_jHHonSy2OHsNyN1Cw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=witchspace81@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
    --cc=gavinandresen@gmail$(echo .)com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox