From: Cheng Wang <cheng@alephium•org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Reducing energy consumption and increasing security at the same time
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 11:43:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJgZxF4G_BjJ=OhuzhjfZtkePnEc2hz8DMZzFzWKBNh17XhBeQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1959 bytes --]
Hi Everyone,
I would like to share my serious work on reducing the energy consumption of
PoW without sacrificing security. My new type of algorithm is called PoLW.
For a practical system where mining is profitable, PoLW could actually
improve the security of the system.
The idea is to shift part of the external cost of mining in the physical
world (mainly energy consumption) to the internal cost of the network. In
PoLW, the miners are able to give up part of the coinbase reward so as to
get weight (> 1) for the block hash they produce. The total cost of
generating a new block would still be equal to maximal coinbase reward in
equilibrium.
I analyzed two algorithms in the paper: linear PoLW and exponential PoLW.
Linear PoLW could reduce energy consumption by a factor close to 1/2 in
equilibrium, while exponential PoLW could reduce energy consumption by an
arbitrary factor in equilibrium.
In a practical system, mining is usually (if not always) profitable. If we
transition from PoW to PoLW, the external costs of mining would decrease
and the internal costs will increase. However, the decrease in external
costs would be less than the increase in internal costs since mining is
profitable. The total cost of block generation would get higher, therefore,
the security will increase.
Of course, we could not decrease the external costs of any existing system
by a factor close to zero immediately. There is a section in my paper
discussing this particularly. The principle of applying PoLW is that
keeping the absolute external cost increasing all the time, but the
percentage of external cost in the total cost gets lower eventually.
This work is based on solid math calculation, and I am looking forward to
feedback and discussions. My paper is available at:
https://github.com/alephium/research/raw/master/polw.pdf
It's inspired by the recent great paper of Itay, Alexander, and Ittay:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.04124
Best,
Cheng Wang
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2355 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2019-12-08 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-08 10:43 Cheng Wang [this message]
[not found] <mailman.3482.1575825776.25512.bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
2019-12-09 0:45 ` Runchao Han
2019-12-09 9:47 ` Cheng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJgZxF4G_BjJ=OhuzhjfZtkePnEc2hz8DMZzFzWKBNh17XhBeQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=cheng@alephium$(echo .)org \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox