Hi Thomas,

can you more elaborate on that "version" bits? What is exact meaning of it? I still think this is more an implementation problem. What stops Electrum to do the same algorithm for searching branches as it is now for used addresses?

These "version bits" need to be covered by the specification as well, because if any client will use them differently (or won't use them at all), it will break cross-compatibility between clients, which was another goal of bip39.

Marek

On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv1@gmx.de> wrote:

here is a simple implementation, with some ideas on how to format the
metadata:
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Talk:BIP_0039

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development